All are nicely represented, but there is no modeled rear engine fuel cap? Small details but important. The roof mounted twin VHF roof aerials are distinctive on the C337, as is the large cooling inlet for the buried rear engine. The detail is very good, with the correct aerodynamic panels surrounding the edges of the flaps, not as so beautifully done as the Thranda, but still worthy here. The 337 has a split Flap system around the Twin-Booms, and an inner and outer flap. however the detail and shape is good, there are the black simulated "Icing Boots" (required for high altitudes), but no blank leading edge option. Wing and detail is also nice, the cambered detailing of the wing tips, that defines the chord is there but not as pronounced as the Thranda. Panels are well represented, as is the NRM highlights and appendage, rivet, screw is visually very well accomplished, cockpit/cabin glass is also well done, shaped and nicely tinted. More Low-Def than Hi-Def, but the work here is very good. The earlier "F" had the IO-360-C Engine (210 HP), were as this "G" model has the TSIO-360-H Engine, Turbocharged and being a Pressurized 337 version, it was also up-rated to 225 HP.Īnother point to make early is that the High-Quality Thranda is US$10 more than this T337G, of which again the Thranda is low priced for the amount of detail and features you get with that aircraft, this Skytouch T337G is a more simpler aircraft in every area, but it is still a nice Cessna 337 for around the sub-$30 category.įirst impressions are very favorable, "This is nice", remember this is SkyTouch's first payware developer release, so for a first time effort it is all very splendid. So why another one?īesides the usual X-Plane, when one comes out, then so does another in the simulator's idiosyncratic way, there is also a significant differences between the two aircraft, this is the "G" model, not the Thranda "F" model, and there are big performance differences between the two aircraft. Well yes X-PlaneReviews has done another 337 review, as earlier in 2023, as Thranda Design released their Cessna 337F Skymaster. Hold on, "haven't we already done a Cessna 337 review already this year?". So the aircraft is a unique stable platform with some very distinctive tasks, this made it very popular and altogether 2,993 variants were built between 1963–1982. artillery spotting), border patrol and fishery protection roles. Basically the 337 was a standard Cessna forward fuselage, but with a totally different concept at the rear.Ĭlever, a twin-engined aircraft in a linear configuration, but the aircraft was highly regarded for tactical operations, say Fire Fighting and Search and Rescue, the Cessna O-2 Skymaster (nicknamed "Oscar Deuce") was the military version used for forward air control (FAC) and psychological operations (PSYOPS), again also a primary aircraft for noted reconnaissance, observation (e.g. In the Cessna 377's case it was two Continental IO-360-C air-cooled flat-six piston engines, 210 hp (160 kW) each, producing a combined 420hp, plus the unique "Twin-Boom" tail arrangement to accommodate the rear (pusher) engine/propeller. The Cessna 337 Series is well renowned, not for that it is a high-wing Cessna, but for it's odd push-pull configuration, in that it has a combination of forward-mounted tractor (pull) propeller, and backward-mounted (pusher) propeller. I hope I was able to assist you with your question.Aircraft Review : Cessna T337G Pressurized Skymaster by Skytouch With your other point about planning to install scenery and many add-on aircraft, with emphasis on the many, I'd say you should leave a fairly good amount of storage, whereas a Add-On airport can be 3GB, and a Add-On aircraft can come close to that as well so just plan it out, and really consider how many add-ons you'll use, and then make a rough estimate.on my Steam, X-Plane 10, with no add-ons requires 80 GB of available space, taking quite a chunk of your hard drive allocation space so with X-Plane 11 I wouldn't be surprised if there's a jump of 5, 10, 15 or even 20 GB to bring it to the low 90's or 100's. Although I can't answer your question firmly, I can give you a fairly good estimate.regarding your question above, I would suggest taking into consideration which of your PC or Mac has more Hard drive space available, or is your Mac only comprising a SSD whereas you PC may have a smaller SSD and a larger HDD? all of this has to be taken into consideration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |